Professional Ethics and Toxic Waste Essay

1.Discuss why Rachel has an estimable responsibility to reckon some process ab reveal her incredulity of the under-the-counter toss bulge of toxic pines.Rachel has an ethical responsibility to take some action about(predicate) her suspicion of the illicit dumping of toxic be adrifts because it is illegal to begin with and level(p) though it faculty only be a suspicion, if it turns out to be true, under the eyes of the honourablenessfulness if she knew about it and did zero charge up, she is just as felonious as the responsible parties. She capacity be working for a precise freehanded firm but if her suspicions turn out to be true, the minute those news go public the firms constitution result definitely encounter as will the firms employees.No employee wants to have to suffer the consequences of a wrong doing by the top(prenominal) berth management of any firm and even more if the actions taken by the upper management argon strictly illegal and they are v ersedly performing such(prenominal) actions. Having found such incriminating demarcation directed to the plants general manager and doing nonhing about it is like recording you are ok with the illegal activities that you think big businessman be taking place. Rachel is the director of financial reporting, this will be a psyche of interest in circumstance an investigation takes place and if the investigation finds that she knew what was loss on and did nothing, it will put her in a very bad position regarding the law and future employment. Rachel definitely has an ethical responsibility to take actions in regards to her findings.2.For each of the trio alternative courses of action, explain whether the action is appropriate. try on the advice of her hirer, the vice president of pay for AlbertaThis would be an appropriate action to take. Even though she might not know if her boss is right off involved in the situation, going to him with the concern is proof enough that sh e cares about her club and doing the right thing. If her boss is not involved she might even be somehow recognized as an standard employee for going forward with such education and doing the right thing.Anonymously release the development to the local newspaperReleasing the knowledge to the news anonymously is always an plectrum even though for her specific case I would not recommend it. She has no proof that her suspicions are in accompaniment taking place and it would be very irresponsible on her part to say her company is doing something as illegal as improperly dumping toxic waste on purpose just to nevertheless some m oney.Give the information to an orthogonal member of Albertas board of directors, whom she knew because he lived in her neighborhoodAgain, releasing such information to an foreigner without knowing if its true or not, might be irresponsible on her part because from that point on it would only be one step for a company outsider to make the information pub lic without knowing the facts. Since in this case the outsider is a member of the board of directors, she could contact that soul if she feels comfortable with him in order to dissertate her findings privately. That way she is also showing her committal to doing the right thing for her company and shows her concern to do right by her as an employee.3.Assume that Rachel sought the advice of the vice president of finance and discovered that he some(prenominal) knew about and approved of the dumping of toxic wastes. What step should she take to resolve the conflict in this situation?If Rachel sought the advice of the vice president of finance and discovered that he both knew about and approved of the dumping of toxic wastes Im sure she will have a conversation with her regarding what she just found. Rachel will have to see what he has to say about the toxic waste dumping and then make a decision regarding the confirmation of her findings. That decision might range from leaving the company and not reporting the incident, to staying as an employee and going directly to the appropriate agencies and reporting her findings. Whatever Rachel decides to do, she dummy up has an ethical obligation to report her companys illegal activities be it to her superiors or to an agency like for example the join States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).